This month’s literary salon pick, The Jane Austen Society, by Natalie Jenner, is a novel set in post-WW2 England about a group of villagers determined to maintain the legacy of Jane Austen by opening a museum at Chawton House, the cottage where Jane spent the last eight years of her life and the most productive period of her writing career.
Who would have predicted that Jane Austen would still be so popular 200 years later, with her face on the ten pound note, dozens of biographies in print, and entire museums devoted to her fame, not to mention the whole tourist trade to places she visited, lived, or described in her novels.
It’s a further testament to her continuing popularity that An Interview with Jane Austen remains my most read post, at 150 some views, from every country in the world, with several more added weekly. Yes, some frivolous little piece I dashed off for Valentine’s Day two years ago is more popular than any post I’ve slaved over for days. But to give credit to Jane, other than the interviewers questions, most of the words are hers, famous quotes from a book I received for Christmas that year, The Wit and Wisdom of Jane Austen. The post itself was inspired by a question – which dead person you would most like to interview? I can’t imagine my small blog of 300 readers is high up on any google search list, so I can only surmise that it must have been shared by a Janeite on one of the many Jane Austen websites.
I would not describe myself as a Janeite, having only ever read Pride and Prejudice and Emma, and watched the movie versions, the dashing Mr. Darcy/Colin Firth, and the petulant Gwyneth Paltrow who forever spoiled Emma for me, and the classic Sense and Sensibility with Kate Winslet, Emma Thompson and Hugh Grant. Other than Pride and Prejudice I find her life more interesting than her books.
JA was born in 1775 and lived most of her young life with her large family of siblings at the rectory in Steventon, where her father was a clergyman. Upon his retirement, they sold everything (including a thousand books, for hers was a well-read family) and Jane moved to Bath with her parents and sister Cassandra. Bath was a very social place and it’s widely assumed this change in residence was partially intended to find marriage partners for the daughters, but that was not to be, for despite rumors of several failed romances Jane never married. After the death of their father and the rental of diminished living quarters, her wealthy brother Edward, who had been adopted by a childless couple in need of an inheritor, eventually offered his widowed mother and sisters the use of the steward’s cottage on his large estate and so they moved to Chawton House in 1809.
The cottage was a large L-shaped building, quite near the street and a busy crossroads, so the thundering of coaches passing by offered little privacy,
but there was a large private garden at the back and they were grateful to finally have a permanent residence of their own.
Although she had written earlier drafts of her novels, this was the scene of the final revisions and the long hoped for dreams of publication, starting first with Sense and Sensibility (1811), Pride and Prejudice (1813), Mansfield Park (1814) and Emma (1816). Northanger Abbey and Persuasion were published posthumously with the seventh and last, Sanditon, left unfinished. (Although never published, PBS filmed a horrible adaptation of Sanditon last January which was universally condemned. Jane would certainly never have approved of the unhappy ending.)
She wrote at this small desk, still a fixture of the museum today, placed by the window for maximum lighting as she wore spectacles, and was known to cover up her manuscript if there was an unexpected visitor at the door. From her niece’s recollections we have an image of Jane sitting by the fireplace and laughing, as a sudden thought occurred to her and she leapt up to write it down. Much of her early writing originated as a means to amuse herself, and her family, as there are only so many samplers you can embroider before you die of boredom.
After her untimely death in 1817 at the age of 41 (of Addison’s Disease), her mother and sister lived on in the cottage, with Cassandra dying in 1845. Although Jane lived long enough to enjoy some initial publishing success and literary fame, it was after the publication of a biography by her nephew in 1850, that her literary reputation was revived, and it has remained steady to this day.
Today Chawton House is the site of the Jane Austen Museum. (link to a virtual tour of the house). As well as original clothing and furnishings of the period, several of her letters are on display, as well as some jewelry (two topaz crosses) given to the sisters by their naval brother. The nearby great house houses a JA library with first editions of all of her books. Jane memorabilia is in such high demand that one of her handwritten letters was recently auctioned off for $200,000, a four page missile to Cassandra, dealing with fashion trends and family news. It saddens me to think of a future with no such memorabilia, only emails and texts which we blithely delete. I’ve never been to England but Chawton House would be high on my list of historical sites to visit. Although thousands of tourists frequent Bath every year in search of Jane, I’d prefer to see where she wrote, not where she went bathroom dancing.
Now back to our book club selection.
Here’s the publishers blurb: “Just after the Second World War, in the small English village of Chawton, an unusual but like-minded group of people band together to attempt something remarkable. One hundred and fifty years ago, Chawton was the final home of Jane Austen, one of England’s finest novelists. Now it’s home to a few distant relatives and their diminishing estate. With the last bit of Austen’s legacy threatened, a group of disparate individuals come together to preserve both Jane Austen’s home and her legacy. These people―a laborer, a young widow, the local doctor, and a movie star, among others―could not be more different and yet they are united in their love for the works and words of Austen. As each of them endures their own quiet struggle with loss and trauma, some from the recent war, others from more distant tragedies, they rally together to create the Jane Austen Society.”
About the author: “Natalie Jenner was born in England and emigrated to Canada as a young child. She obtained her B.A. and her LL.B. from the University of Toronto, where she was the 1990 Gold Medalist in English Literature at St. Michael’s College, and was Called to the Bar of Ontario in 1995. In addition to a brief career as a corporate lawyer, Natalie has worked as a recruiter, career coach, and consultant to leading law firms in Canada for over two decades. Most recently Natalie founded the independent bookstore Archetype Books in Oakville, Ontario, where she lives with her family and two rescue dogs. A lifelong devotee of all things Jane Austen, “The Jane Austen Society” is her first published novel.” (Goodreads profile)
Quite a distinguished resume, but what’s so interesting about Natalie Jenner is that in her 30’s she wrote five unpublished books – Five. Unpublished. Books. There’s a lot of tenacity there. After her husband developed a serious illness, she turned to re-reading her favorite novels for solace, including the JA novels. Later, when he had recovered, she was contemplating writing a novel set in a great house similar to Downton Abbey but decided to change it to a fictional novel about how the JA museum came to be. For research she took a bucket list trip to a Jane Austen Festival in Bath, (yes there are many of these conventions) as well as the village of Chawton, in order to immerse herself in the world of all things Jane.
Discussion:
This was an enjoyable read, even if you aren’t particularly a JA fan, in much the same genre as The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Society and the Chilbury Ladies Choir. I’m sure the movie rights have already been sold. In true Jane Austen style, the author manages to pair off most of the characters, some more successfully than others and some in a politically correct way, although I had difficulty getting a sense of the two characters who were mirrored after Emma and Mr. Knightley. A minor point, but there’s one graphic scene (me too/movie starlet on the casting couch) which seemed out of place. This was noted in a a Goodreads review, and it’s like when someone points out a flaw, you can’t un-see it. The reviewer said she quit reading after that, saying that such a jarring scene had no place in a Jane Austen-like book. I wouldn’t abandon the book over that but subtle allusion might have been more appropriate, or perhaps some gentle editorial guidance.
This book debuted on the bestseller list, as any book with JA in the title is bound to attract attention due to the sheer number of her fans worldwide. (I wonder if I changed my website to The Jane Austen Homeplace, if I might attract a few more followers?)
Jane Austen must have had a strong belief in herself, and a premonition that her works would live on, as she left the bulk of her estate (400 pounds, the proceedings from her books), to her sister Cassandra, with the unusual request that 90 pounds, a considerable sum back then, be set aside for a burial at the prestigious Winchester Cathedral, instead of the local churchyard where her family could visit. Her brothers made no mention of her literary life on the tombstone, perhaps deeming her novels too inconsequential to note, but thousands of tourists flock to her grave-site every year to pay homage to her literary greatness.
thehomeplaceweb 
I didn’t live this book, and I’m an Austen fan. It’s my problem with historical fiction though…I think they imposed 21st century ideals on 20th century characters and it made it clunky.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I take your point. While I wouldn’t rate it five stars I found it readable and of interest to JA fans. It could have maybe benefited from a bit of re-writing or editing, especially a couple of the characters, to make it a great book.
LikeLiked by 1 person
See, I don’t know how many real Austen fans would enjoy it. I read it because I am a JA acolyte, but found it too much. It’s like people need to capitalize on her knowing that JA still has a devoted following. But have people based it more on movies than the actual books? We’ve created so many off shoots of Jane Austen …but now I’m off on tangents…FYI I just reread Northanger Abbey for book club and I admit there’s a reason why it was first written and last published. Reading that as a stand alone novel is disappointing
LikeLiked by 1 person
And my guess was that sanction was supposed to be a series, so they left it at a cliffhanger to get people involved. The adaptation was again marred by 21st century viewpoints instilled in a historical novel. As we continue to do that, we are going to lose our threads to actually what happened. But I’ll spare you from this rabbit hole
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I know they were hoping for Season Two, but I found Season One so stupid that I don’t think I would have tuned in. I saw an interview with the writer/producer of the series and he was a JA expert, so go figure?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know the novel was unfinished, so they could take creative license…but he tried too hard to recreate Darcy and Elizabeth. And some of the other characters too. It needed something, but I’m not sure what
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m not a Janeite but wouldn’t mind visiting her home in England. I enjoy seeing in person how famous people lived. I’ve read Pride and Prejudice & Emma, too. I’ve also read Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, which I thought was a hoot. I liked The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Society, so I’m thinking Jenner’s novel might be a good one for me to add to my list. Thanks for the idea and this info about JA. Most interesting.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Ally! I’ll have to put the Zombie book on my list – I’ve never read any zombie literature, but I remember seeing the title when it came out. It’s the historical aspect I like of where an author lived.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Our Book Club last met in February! In the interim who knows what books members have read. I have feasted on non-fiction in the absence of novels – although purchased two because of a great ‘need’ to ‘get lost’! I have read all of Jane Austen’s novels and studied two of them at university (not the best way to be introduced to a novel!) and, fortunately, have even visited Chawton, which I found charming. I do not like the modern interpretation of her works, although this one you mention sounds as if it may be worth looking out for. Thank you for drawing it to our attention, Joni.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Anne! Lucky you, for visiting Chawton and England!
LikeLike
It was a very long time ago!
LikeLiked by 1 person
A really lovely informative post Joni. Here i am living in England and I have never been. Maybe one day.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Alison! Oh please do go when this pandemic is over and report back! I enjoyed the small peek at the house through the website virtual tour, but then I love any kind of history.
LikeLike
I tried reading P & P, but just couldn’t get through it. My favorite film sort of based on it is Lost in Austen. If you haven’t seen it, do check it out. It’s a lot of fun.
I do like that line in her epitaph, too!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I could only get through P&P and Emma because I’ve seen the movies, but otherwise, yes her books can sometimes be hard to get through. I liked Lost in Austen too!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Years of reading books for literature classes in high school and college and I had to dissect the same old books over and over again and the Middle English books – ugh. So, why did we never read Jane Austen Joni? A defect I suspect. You really did a thorough job here and I liked the quote: “there is nothing like staying at home for real comfort.” How fitting for 2020!
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re right Linda – I never studied any JA in high school English, even though we had to do monthly book reports. I don’t remember studying the Brontes either. Most likely women writers weren’t emphasized back then? I never took an university arts courses so was spared the dissection process – the only dissection we did was cadavers in Anatomy 101 – the med students were the only ones allowed to cut – we just had to observe and identify. Not my favorite class – I was the kid who had to leave the room during the first class because the formaldehyde smell got to me. I understand why English literature is ruined for so many people though by over-analysis – I feel that way about poetry.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There were a few books that even CliffsNotes were not helpful during my college years. My first year of college I soon realized how inadequate our high school was. We had two years of abbreviated classes as the millage did not pass, so no college prep classes, just four classes per day. We read none of the classics among many other books/authors and to this day, I still have not read many “classics” books. One day, hopefully I will catch up on what I missed. I disliked reading books that had to be analyzed and I’ve felt that way with poetry, especially the deep and brooding poetry that is difficult to follow.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wonderful post, I had never thought of visiting Jane Austen’s home, so lovely to see it here. What a detailed tombstone. You didn’t mention how she died, she was very young? Seems like she must have been ill? Have you read anything about that? Thanks for sharing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They think she died of Addison’s disease,, from the description of her symptoms I guess, and was sick for about a year before.
I don’t think Addidson’s disease was a known diagnosis back then, but one of the symptoms can be darkening of the skin. JFK had Addison’s disease and treatment today involves replacement cortisol hormones. The other possibility is lymphoma, at any rate a wasting disease. She never finished her last book Sanditon. The last few months of her life her brothers moved her to a different city in the hope of finding medical expertise so she did not actually die at Chawton House.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This was a delightful, informative post, Joni. I think I’d prefer reading another Jane Austen book rather than this one, but I enjoyed your review and the historical overview, with your fun little quips inserted here and there.
We were in Bath once, but I somehow missed the Austen connection. When I think of Bath, I think of Chaucer’s “Wife of Bath,” whose persona I once took on in English class in the form of a Chaucerian poem because I was too lazy to write a research paper.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Annie! I know nothing of Chaucer nor much of English lit, period. I did read your recent post this morning (and some but not all of the comments) and am digesting it, will comment later. I’m behind with Reader again so am late to the discussion. I find when I do the Wordless Wednesdays I can keep up with Reader, but when I write longer pieces I’m always behind with reading. Oh well, gloomy days are ahead and I’ll be stuck inside soon.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really appreciate your comments, but don’t burden yourself, ok?
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, but I find it interesting to read different points of view, even if I can’t contribute much.
LikeLike
Even I have read Pride and Prejudice, though it was many years ago when I set off to actually read the attractive leather-bound volumes in the living room bookcase. I got maybe a third of the way through before life interfered, but I have my eventual retirement project waiting. Anyway I recall enjoying it much more than some other selections on the shelf.
And isn’t it funny which posts bring so much traffic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m impressed JP! That’s an admirable retirement goal. Those leather bound classics are getting harder to find these days, although I did buy a nice copy of Dauphne DuMaurier’s Rebecca last year at a book sale, complete with gilt edging, which I have not read yet but it looks pretty on the shelf, being bound in dark green. With so many people being interviewed on TV from their homes now I find myself studying their bookshelves and wondering what’s on them, to the point that I sometimes ignore the words of wisdom coming out of their mouths. Re stats – An Interview with Jane Austen has now climbed to 238 views, with How to Make a Chestnut Wreath closing in on second. Go figure – maybe not too many people have interviewed Jane or made a chestnut wreath? If my memory is correct, you posted that an obscure/favorite/but possibly discontinued junk food was your top post? Something we didn’t have in Canada, so I don’t recall the name of it, but people must be searching for it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
PS. I should add that I just finished John Grisham’s latest novel A Time for Mercy and found it a riveting read – at 450 pages I could hardly put it down and stayed up late way too many nights. I don’t know if you are a JG fan but it’s certainly one of his best. He’s written 34 books and in this one revisited the same small southern town and young lawyer from his first book way back in 1989, the one that only sold 5000 copies. It’s a courtroom drama, which may not be escape fiction for you though…..it would probably make a good movie.
LikeLiked by 1 person